Chapter 1
The One Chain That Reveals Everything

The Invisible System

You know the monthly client performance reporting process at Apex Media Partners is painful. Your three Media Buyers—Sam, Jeremy, and Steven—complain about "data export hell" every beginning of the month. Your Account Managers always seem stressed the first week. Clients sometimes get their reports late.

But could you draw exactly how a performance report flows from start to finish—every person involved, every handoff, every place where work waits or breaks?

Most directors can't. They know it's a problem, but the problem is invisible. Diffuse. "It's just how we work."

This chapter makes it visible.

By the end, you'll have an Outcome Map showing:

  • The complete chain from trigger (beginning of the month) to delivery (client receives performance report)

  • Every person involved and what they actually do

  • The real cost in time, people, and handoffs

What an Outcome Map Shows

An Outcome Map reveals the hidden structure of work.

It's not a task list ("create report, send report"). It's not a flowchart (swimlanes and decision diamonds). It's not documentation for ISO certification.

It's a diagnostic tool that makes weak links visible.

What an Outcome Map Captures:

  1. One critical business outcome

    Not "things the team does" but "observable business results delivered to someone."

    Examples:

    • "Approved monthly performance report delivered to client" (not "update spreadsheets")

    • "At-risk customer list ready for executive meeting" (not "check health scores")

    • "Approved pay application submitted to client" (not "do billing work")

    The outcome has a trigger (what kicks it off) and an end point (delivered to whom).


  2. The complete chain of people and activities

    For each step:

    • Who does it (person or role)

    • What they do (specific activity)

    • How long it takes (time estimate)

    • What they hand off (to whom, in what format)

    Stay at the right altitude:

    Too high: "Agency prepares client reports" (missing all the detail)

    Too low: "Open Google Ads, click Campaigns tab, select date range, click Export..." (too granular)

    Just right: "Media Buyer exports Google Ads data for TechVantage (67 campaigns) as CSV" (captures what matters)


  3. The real costs

    Four metrics that make invisible work visible:

    • Total people involved: Count everyone who touches this outcome

    • Collective time: Sum of everyone's hours (not calendar time)

    • Calendar time: Trigger to delivery—captures all the waiting

    • Major handoffs: Count the passes between people

    These numbers reveal the hidden tax of weak links.

Cross-Industry Examples

The anatomy of an outcome chain looks the same across industries. Only the specifics differ.

Construction

Outcome: "Approved monthly pay application submitted to client"

Typical chain: PM assesses site progress → Accountant consolidates 15 subcontractor invoices → Principal reviews → signs → submits

Common pain: 3-hour manual consolidation with 15% error rate from copy-paste mistakes

E-commerce

Outcome: "Weekly inventory purchase orders sent to suppliers"

Typical chain: Manager exports inventory levels → exports sales velocity → looks up supplier lead times → calculates reorder points → formats POs per supplier requirements → Director approves → sends

Common pain: 5.5 hours of manual calculation and format conversion, stock-outs from outdated lead time data

SaaS Company

Outcome: "Weekly at-risk customer list ready for executive meeting"

Typical chain: CSMs update touchpoint data → export usage scores → cross-reference support tickets → calculate health scores → Director consolidates → presents to execs

Common pain: 3 hours per CSM extracting and entering data from 3 systems that don't talk to each other

Marketing Agency

Outcome: "Monthly multi-platform ad performance report delivered to client"

Typical chain: Media Buyer exports data from 3 platforms → merges in Excel → Account Manager writes analysis → Client Success Director reviews → presents to client

Common pain: 4 hours of data extraction and merging blocks analysis work

Your outcome will have different specifics. The anatomy is the same: trigger → people → handoffs → breakage → waiting → delivery.

Mapping the Client Performance Report

This section demonstrates mapping one outcome in detail to show how the framework works in practice.

OUTCOME: Monthly Multi-Platform Ad Performance Report Delivered to Client

The questions you ask are identical for any outcome. Apply the same process to your specific situation.

The Three Questions That Build the Map

Question 1: "What triggers this outcome?"

Not "when does it happen" but "what specific event kicks off the chain?"

For your performance report, be specific about the triggering event:

Vague: "Happens monthly"

Specific: "First business day of the month (reporting on previous month's performance)"

Example: For Apex Media Partners' performance report, the trigger is "First business day of the month (reporting on previous month's performance)."

The trigger matters because it shows you where the weak link chain begins.

Question 2: "What actually happens, step by step?"

Walk through the real flow. Not the ideal process from the handbook. Not what you wish happened. What ACTUALLY happens.

Ask:

  • Who does what first?

  • What do they hand off, and to whom?

  • What happens next?

Here's how this unfolded when the Apex team mapped their client reporting:

TRIGGER: 1st business day of the month

The Director asks Sam (Media Buyer): "When the new month starts, what happens first?"

Sam: "I get a calendar reminder. I start pulling data for our biggest clients first. Let me walk you through TechVantage—they're our largest at $10 million in annual ad spend."

Trigger

1st business day of the month

Media Buyer

Media Buyer - Sam

The Director asks: "What do you do first?"

Sam: "I log into Google Ads. I export TechVantage's campaign performance data for last month. They have 67 active campaigns, so it's a lot of rows. I need custom columns—Spend, Conversions, Cost per Acquisition, ROAS. The export takes about 40 minutes because I have to set up the date range, configure the custom report, select the right campaigns, and wait for the download. Google's export can be slow for large accounts."

Captured:

  • Person: Media Buyer (Sam)

  • Activity: Export Google Ads data for TechVantage

    • 67 campaigns

    • ~$480K monthly spend on Google Ads

    • Custom metrics: Spend, Conversions, CPA, ROAS

  • Time: 40 minutes

  • Output: CSV file (Google Ads export)

Media Buyer

Export Google Ads data

(67 campaigns, ~$480K monthly spend)

40 Min

The Director asks: "Then what?"

Sam: "Then I do the same for Meta Ads Manager. TechVantage spends about $300K/month there on Facebook and Instagram. Similar process—34 campaigns, export with date range. Takes about 30 minutes."

Captured:

  • Activity: Export Meta Ads Manager data

    • 34 campaigns

    • ~$300K monthly spend on Meta

  • Time: 30 minutes

  • Output: CSV file (Meta export)

Export Meta Ads Manager data

(34 campaigns, ~$300K monthly spend)

30 Min

The Director asks: "Is that it, or are there more platforms?"

Sam: "One more—LinkedIn Campaign Manager. About $53K/month spend there. Only 18 campaigns. Takes about 20 minutes to export."

Captured:

  • Activity: Export LinkedIn Campaign Manager data

    • 18 campaigns

    • ~$53K monthly spend on LinkedIn

  • Time: 20 minutes

  • Output: CSV file (LinkedIn export)

Export LinkedIn Campaign Manager data (18 campaigns, ~$53K monthly spend)

20 Min

The Director asks: "Okay, so you have three CSV files. What happens next?"

Sam: "The merge. I open our master Excel template—the consolidated reporting file we use for all clients. Then I start combining data from all three CSVs. Takes about an hour and a half."

Captured:

  • Activity: Merge three platform CSVs into master Excel template

  • Time: 1.5 hours

  • Output: Consolidated Excel file

Merge three CSVs into master

Excel template

90 Min

The Director asks: "What happens after the merge?"

Sam: "I fix formula errors and validate the data. Even after merging, there are formula errors to clean up. I go through the spreadsheet looking for errors, fix them one at a time. Usually takes 30-45 minutes."

Captured:

  • Activity: Fix formula errors and validate data

  • Time: 45 minutes

  • Output: Consolidated Excel file (clean)

Fix formula errors and validate data

45 Min

The Director asks: "Then what happens?"

Sam: "Once the data is merged and clean, I calculate the aggregate metrics. Total spend across all platforms—should be about $833K for TechVantage. Blended ROAS—that's total revenue divided by total spend across Google, Meta, and LinkedIn. And blended Cost per Acquisition. That takes another 45 minutes because I'm calculating weighted averages across platforms and making sure all the cross-references work correctly."

Captured:

  • Activity: Calculate aggregate cross-platform metrics

    • Total spend (sum across Google, Meta, LinkedIn)

    • Blended ROAS (total revenue ÷ total spend, weighted by platform)

    • Blended CPA (weighted average across channels)

  • Time: 45 minutes

  • Output: Complete consolidated data with aggregate metrics

Calculate aggregate cross-platform

metrics: Total spend, Blended ROAS,

Blended CPA

45 Min

The Director asks: "And then you hand it off?"

Sam: "Yeah, I email the Excel file to Jordan."

Captured:

  • Handoff: Email consolidated Excel file

  • To: Account Manager (Jordan)

  • Total time for Sam (per client): 4.5 hours

Media Buyer

Handoff

Email consolidated Excel file to Account Manager

Account Manager

Account Manager - Jordan

The Director asks Jordan (Account Manager): "What happens when you get Sam's file?"

Jordan: "I review the consolidated data. Make sure nothing looks obviously wrong—like if a campaign that was spending $30K last month suddenly shows $3K, I'd catch that and ask Sam to double-check. Or if the total spend is way off from what I remember approving for the month. Takes about 30 minutes."

Captured:

  • Activity: Review consolidated data for obvious errors

  • Time: 30 minutes

Account Manager

Review consolidated data for obvious errors

30 Min

The Director asks: "What do you do next?"

Jordan: "I write the performance narrative for TechVantage. They want to know: Which campaigns are winning? Which are underperforming? What should we do next month? I analyze the data and write the insights. Usually 4-5 paragraphs plus bullet-pointed recommendations. Takes about an hour."

Captured:

  • Activity: Write performance narrative

    • Which campaigns delivered highest ROAS (winners)

    • Which campaigns underperformed (recommend pause/optimize)

    • Recommendations for next month's budget allocation

  • Time: 1 hour

  • Output: Written analysis (Word doc or directly in deck)

Write performance narrative: Winners,

under-performers, recommendations

60 Min

The Director asks: "Then?"

Jordan: "I create the client deck. PowerPoint. I take screenshots from the Excel file—top campaigns table, ROAS trend chart, spend breakdown by platform. Format it to match our agency template. Add the narrative I wrote. Usually takes another hour because I'm manually formatting charts, adjusting colors, making sure everything looks polished."

Captured:

  • Activity: Create client presentation deck (PowerPoint)

    • Screenshots from consolidated Excel

    • Charts (manually formatted to agency brand)

    • Add written narrative

  • Time: 1 hour

  • Output: PowerPoint deck

Create client presentation deck: Screenshots from Excel, charts, add narrative

60 Min

The Director asks: "Do you send it directly to the client?"

Jordan: "No, Morgan (Client Success Director) reviews it first. She oversees all our major client relationships. I email the deck to Morgan for approval."

Captured:

  • Handoff: Email PowerPoint deck

  • To: Client Success Director (Morgan)

  • Total time for Jordan (per client): 2.5 hours

Account Manager

Handoff

Email deck to Client Success Director

Client Success Director

Client Success Director - Morgan

The Director asks Morgan (Client Success Director): "What do you do when you get Jordan's deck?"

Morgan: "I review it - checking that the narrative makes sense for TechVantage specifically, that the recommendations align with what I know about their goals from my conversations with their CMO. Takes about 30 minutes per deck. Once it looks good, I approve it and Jordan schedules the client presentation."

Captured:

  • Activity: Review deck for narrative quality/strategic alignment and approve

  • Time: 30 minutes

The Director asks: "Once approved?"

Morgan: "Jordan schedules the client presentation call. The deck gets sent to TechVantage, and Jordan presents it in their monthly strategy review."

Captured:

  • Activity: Approve deck

  • Handoff: Deck ready for client presentation

  • End of chain

  • Total time for Morgan (per client): 30 minutes

Client Success Director

Review deck for narrative quality/strategic alignment and approve

30 Min

Question 3: "What are the real costs?"

Here's what this Outcome Map reveals:

For one client report:

  • 7-8 hours of collective work

  • 3 people involved (Sam, Jordan, Morgan)

  • 4-5 days of calendar time

  • 2 major handoffs

Scaled across Apex Media Partners' 15 clients:

  • 112.5 hours monthly on client reporting (approximately 14 full workdays)

67.5 hours from Media Buyers alone on data extraction and merging

The Complete Outcome Map

Outcome Map

Outcome Map

Monthly Multi-Platform Ad Performance Report

Monthly Multi-Platform Ad Performance Report

Trigger

1st business day of the month

Media Buyer

Export Google Ads data

(67 campaigns, ~$480K monthly spend)

40 Min

Export Meta Ads Manager data

(34 campaigns, ~$300K monthly spend)

30 Min

Export LinkedIn Campaign Manager data

(18 campaigns, ~$53K monthly spend)

20 Min

Merge three CSVs into master Excel template

90 Min

Fix formula errors and validate data

45 Min

Calculate aggregate cross-platform metrics:

Total spend, Blended ROAS, Blended CPA

45 Min

Handoff

Email consolidated Excel file to Account Manager

Account Manager

Review consolidated data

for obvious errors

30 Min

Write performance narrative: Winners,

under-performers, recommendations

60 Min

Create client presentation deck:

Screenshots from Excel, charts,

add narrative

60 Min

Handoff

Email deck to Client Success Director

Client Success Director

Review deck for narrative

quality/strategic alignment

and approve

30 Min

Outcome Delivered

Client - TechVantage receives deck, Jordan presents in monthly review call

Metrics

People involved

Collective Time

Calendar time

Handoffs

3

7.5 hours

4-5 days

2

Scaled Impact

Frequency

Monthly Collective Time

15

112.5 hours

Insight

Agency structure:

  • 3 Media Buyers: Sam, Jeremy, Steven

  • Each handles ~5 clients

  • 15 total clients (ranging $6-12M annual spend, averaging $8M)

  • $120M total managed spend annually

  • $9.6M annual agency revenue (8% of spend)


Monthly reporting workload:

  • 15 clients × 7.5 hours average = 112.5 collective hours monthly

  • Across 3 Media Buyers + Account Managers + Morgan


Media Buyer time breakdown (per Media Buyer handling 5 clients):

  • Sam's monthly workload: 5 clients × 4.5 hrs = 22.5 hours

  • Same for Jeremy and Steven


Agency-wide Media Buyer time:

  • 3 Media Buyers × 22.5 hrs each = 67.5 hours/month on data extraction and merging


Agency-wide reality:

  • First week of every month: "Data export hell"

  • Media Buyers often working evenings to complete merges

  • Account Managers' analysis time compressed (can't start until Wednesday)

  • Client presentations sometimes delayed to 2nd week of month

  • Sam, Jeremy, and Steven all complain about Monday mornings


The structure is now visible

You can see the complete chain from trigger (1st business day) to delivery (client presentation).

You know where time goes: Sam (4.5 hrs), Jordan (2.5 hrs), Morgan (30 min).

You've captured the four core metrics: 3 people, 7.5 hours collective time, 4-5 days calendar time, 2 handoffs.

But you don't yet know WHERE the pain is. Which of these links are causing the most frustration? Which ones break frequently? Which ones create bottlenecks?

Sam spends 4.5 hours on this process. Jordan spends 2.5 hours. But not all of those hours are equally painful. Some steps work fine. Some are soul-crushing.

Chapter 2 will show you how to find which links are weak by counting complaint, breakage, and waiting signals at each link.

You can see the complete chain from trigger (1st business day) to delivery (client presentation).

You know where time goes: Sam (4.5 hrs), Jordan (2.5 hrs), Morgan (30 min).

You've captured the four core metrics: 3 people, 7.5 hours collective time, 4-5 days calendar time, 2 handoffs.

But you don't yet know WHERE the pain is. Which of these links are causing the most frustration? Which ones break frequently? Which ones create bottlenecks?

Sam spends 4.5 hours on this process. Jordan spends 2.5 hours. But not all of those hours are equally painful. Some steps work fine. Some are soul-crushing.

Chapter 2 will show you how to find which links are weak by counting complaint, breakage, and waiting signals at each link.

How to gather this information

Option 1 Team Offsite

Best for: Complex outcomes with multiple handoffs (4+ people involved)

What it looks like:

  • Half-day session away from office (or dedicated conference room)

  • Bring everyone who touches this outcome

  • Uninterrupted time—no Slack, no email, no "I need to jump on a quick call"

  • Facilitator guides the mapping (can be internal leader or external)

Why this works:

  • Forces focus: Can't map an outcome chain in 30-minute increments between meetings

  • Surfaces handoff issues: "Wait, I thought YOU were checking that?"

  • Builds shared understanding: Everyone sees the full picture, not just their part

  • Signals executive commitment: "We're investing time to fix this properly"

When to choose this:

→ First outcome map (set the pattern right)

→ Outcome involves 4+ people across departments

→ Lots of handoffs and waiting points

→ Team hasn't mapped processes together before

Option 2 Working Session

Best for: Simpler chains with 2-3 people, clear boundaries

What it looks like:

  • 90-minute block with core team

  • Can be done in-office IF truly uninterrupted

  • Collaborative whiteboard or digital tool (Miro, Figma)

  • One person facilitates, others contribute

Why this works:

  • Faster: Less time commitment than offsite

  • Flexible: Easier to schedule

  • Sufficient for straightforward chains

When to choose this:

→ Fewer handoffs (2-3 max)

→ Team already knows the process well

→ Outcome is relatively linear (not many dependencies)

Option 3 1-on-1 Interviews

Best for: When you're very familiar with the work, just need to validate details

What it looks like:

  • 30-minute interviews with each person in the chain

  • You map the outcome based on interviews

  • Bring the team together for 45-minute validation session

  • Correct gaps and confirm accuracy

Why this works:

  • Fastest: Least total time commitment for the team

  • Works across time zones: Can interview people asynchronously

  • Good for documenting existing knowledge

When to choose this:

→ You're intimately familiar with the process already

→ Outcome is linear (not many handoffs or dependencies)

→ Team is distributed or hard to gather simultaneously

Risk: You might miss handoff issues that only surface in group discussion

What Format To Use For The Map

Don't overthink this. Use whatever's easiest:

  • Whiteboard sketch → phone photo

  • Miro board or Figma

  • Google Doc with bullet points

  • Excel table

  • Hand-drawn on paper

The format doesn't matter. What matters:

→ You can see the complete chain

→ You know where time goes

→ You can identify the weak links

→ The team agrees "yes, this is how it actually works"

Tip: Start analog (whiteboard, sticky notes), then digitize later only if needed for reference. Messy accurate beats beautiful wrong.

Examples Across Industries

Before diving deeper, here are mapped outcomes from different contexts showing the universal pattern:

Construction Pay App

OUTCOME: Approved Monthly Pay Application Submitted to Client

TRIGGER: Calendar reminder on 25th of month

QUICK VIEW:

  • 18 people involved (PM, Tiffany, Principal, 15 subs)

  • 22-24 collective hours

  • 8-10 calendar days

  • Major weak link: Tiffany manually consolidates 15 sub invoices (3 hrs, 15% copy-paste error rate)

E-commerce Inventory Reorder

OUTCOME: Purchase Orders Sent to Suppliers for Restocking

TRIGGER: Monday morning weekly cycle

QUICK VIEW:

  • 2 people involved (Inventory Manager, Ops Director)

  • 5.5 hours weekly

  • Major weak link: Manual reorder calculations using outdated lead times → stock-outs

SaaS Customer Health Score

OUTCOME: At-Risk Customer List Ready for Executive Meeting

TRIGGER: Friday afternoon (prepare for Monday meeting)

QUICK VIEW:

  • 9 people involved (8 CSMs + Director)

  • 26 collective hours weekly

  • Major weak link: Each CSM manually aggregates data from 3 systems (3 hrs each, account name mismatches across Salesforce/Zendesk)

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Mistake 1: Mapping the ideal process instead of actual reality

Wrong "According to our SOP document from 2019, reports should be completed in 3 hours"

Right "In reality, it takes Sam 4.5 hours because campaigns have grown from 40 to 67 per client, and platform export formats keep changing"

Always map what ACTUALLY happens today, not what's supposed to happen.


Mistake 2: Going too granular (clicks and keystrokes)

Wrong "Sam opens Google Ads, clicks the hamburger menu, selects Reports, clicks Campaigns, sets date range to last 30 days from dropdown, clicks custom columns..."

Right "Sam exports Google Ads campaign data as CSV with Spend, Conversions, CPA, ROAS columns (40 min)"

Capture what matters for automation decisions, not every mouse click.


Mistake 3: Staying too high-level (missing the painful specifics)

Wrong "Team prepares monthly client reports"

Right "Sam exports from 3 platforms (1.5 hrs), manually merges with VLOOKUP failures requiring manual matching (1.5 hrs), fixes errors (45 min), Jordan writes analysis (1 hr), creates deck (1 hr)"

The specifics are where automation opportunities live.

Your Action Plan

Create your Outcome Map using the three-part process.

Process:

  1. Pick your critical outcome

  2. Gather the information using one of the three methods:

    • Team Offsite (recommended for first map, complex outcomes)

    • Working Session (simpler outcomes, 2-3 people)

    • 1-on-1 Interviews (if you know the process well)

  3. Capture for each link:

    • Role and activity

    • Time estimates (realistic, not aspirational)

    • Handoffs (what gets passed, to whom)


What you’ll have:

  • One mapped outcome (trigger → chain → delivery)

  • Four metrics (people, collective time, calendar time, handoffs)


What this gives you:

Directors get:
"I can finally show the CFO where 112.5 hours actually goes each month. Not vague 'overhead'—specific weak links: 67.5 hours of Media Buyer time on data extraction because three ad platforms don't talk to each other. At $120M in managed spend, we can't afford this inefficiency."

Team members get:
"Leadership finally sees why I'm underwater the first week of every month. It's not that I'm slow—it's that I'm manually doing what three API integrations should handle."

Everyone gets:
A shared language. A visible map. No more vague "reporting is broken"—now it's "Sam spends 4.5 hours per client (1.5 hrs export, 1.5 hrs merge, 0.75 hrs error fixing, 0.75 hrs aggregates), Jordan spends 2.5 hours, total 7.5 hours collective time."


You can see the chain now. Next: find which links are rattling loudest.